Corporate Bank Accounts Allegedly Used to Launder Scam Proceeds: A Reminder for CSPs

A Russian man who operated a corporate service provider (CSP) and a Singaporean woman he recruited as a local director were due to be charged on 9 October 2026 over alleged money laundering and related activities involving corporate bank accounts.

According to the Singapore Police Force, the 35-year-old man provided corporate secretarial services to local and foreign clients through a CSP he owned between 2020 and 2021. He served as a director of one client company and recruited the 42-year-old woman and two other individuals as local directors of at least five other companies.

The woman opened a bank account and controlled other accounts belonging to two companies of which she was a director. Police investigations indicated that the man and woman later arranged for unidentified persons to control the companies’ bank accounts.

Between March and June 2021, one account received more than US$16,200, S$221,500 and approximately A$100,000 suspected to be proceeds of fraud and investment scams targeting victims overseas. A second account received almost US$164,000 in proceeds from an investment scam in November 2021. Police said the woman could not satisfactorily explain the source of the funds when questioned.

The man and woman were each set to face money laundering charges under the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act, as well as charges relating to abetting unauthorised access to the corporate bank accounts under the Computer Misuse Act.

Police also outlined separate allegations. After an expected transfer of more than S$430,700 to a third company’s account failed, the woman allegedly cashed a cheque for the same amount and passed the cash to an unidentified person associated with the man. The money was traced to fraud against an overseas company.

The man had also recruited two other local directors who, according to investigators, were told they did not need to supervise their companies or bank accounts. Police said he would face charges that included deceiving a bank about a company’s ultimate beneficial owner when opening an account. The Police announced further charges against him involving an allegedly forged document and an agreement with a bail surety.

What this means for CSPs

This case draws attention to the point where company formation, nominee directorships and bank account arrangements meet. A CSP should establish who ultimately owns and controls a client company, understand its intended activities, and pay close attention to who will actually operate its bank accounts. A local director must also be able to understand and oversee the company rather than simply lend their name to it. If control of an account is to pass to someone else, the identity, authority and purpose of that person require careful scrutiny and a clear record. These are practical questions to address during onboarding and revisit when a company’s ownership, directors or account access changes.

The allegations had not been proven in court at the time of the Police announcement.

Source: Singapore Police Force, 8 October 2026.

Read more

Whatsapp Let’s Talk
SHARE
TOP